Freedom as ethical practices: on the possibility of freedom through freeganism and freecycling in Hong Kong

Freedom as ethical practices: on the possibility of freedom through freeganism and freecycling in Hong Kong
Loretta Ieng Tak Lou
Although the idea of freedom has been well studied as an ideal in political philosophy, relatively little scholarship has focused on the human experience of freedom. Drawing on ethnographic research between 2012 and 2013, I examine how freedom was achieved by people who practice freeganism and freecycling in Hong Kong. I show that the freedom that these people pursue, either individually or collectively, is not a freedom without constraints but a freedom that must be attained through the exercise of deliberation, restraint, and self-discipline. While freegans seek liberation by withdrawing from the world and practicing self-cultivation (chushi asceticism), freecyclers do so by engaging with worldly affairs in order to create social changes (rushi asceticism). In both cases, by reimagining freedom as ethical practices rather than a right that comes naturally with birth, freegans and freecyclers in Hong Kong are able to experience moments of freedom despite inevitable structural constraints.

Publication date

2019

Journal title, volume/issue number, page range

Asian Anthropology, 18/4, pp.249-265

ISSN

21684227

Specialisation

Social Sciences

Theme

Urban / Rural
Society
Other
National politics
Art and Culture
History
Globalisation
Environment
Economy